Explaining something plainly. Laying out the facts. Having
video proof to back it up.
Only a Republican can, with complete confidence, say it’s
not true. And fight over it.
And my buddy Richard is a fucking Republican ninja master at
blatant truth denying.
The names have been changed to protect the innocent and the
guilty – and all the shady characters in between.
Enjoy…
¡Vete a la Chingada, los Republicanos! #24 in a series:
Teabaggers. Doncha just think they're the cutest EVER?
(Full ¡Vete! list is chronicled in my Pages section to the right -->)
In case you missed the Teabag Republican debate on Monday,
9/12/11, I believe the highlight was when Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul if an
uninsured man should be left to die if he got sick. The moronic Teabag crowd
unanimously and emphatically shouted YEAH! WOOO! YES! and with great applause.
Yes. Let a fellow American die because he can't afford
or made the poor choice to not have health insurance. That would be the patriotic thing to do. The moral thing. And
wasn't it Jesus who said, "Fuck 'em."? Teabaggers are a very
religious bunch, right?
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't a couple years ago
these fucking uneducated nimrods storm town halls and protest Barack Obama's
non-existent DEATH PANELS? You know, the ones that never existed but were made
up as a fear-mongering tactic by Republicans to make people vote against their
best wishes unless they had taken the time to find out what that was really
about instead of blindly following Republican lies? Yeah, those Death Panels.
Well, it kind of seems like these stupid dick holes are all for Death Panels
now. Why? Because it's OK for Republicans to randomly decide who gets to be put
to death but not Democrats?
These Teabaggers are the dumbest fuckers on the planet.
Oh, and before I forget, I'd like to bury these hypocritical
fucktards under a little more love. In the previous debate on Wednesday,
9/7/11, Brian Williams only got as far as mentioning the fact that Rick Perry
executed more people than any other Governor before the Republican crowd burst
into enthusiastic applause.
What the fuck is wrong with these uncivilized,
violence-loving assholes?
Yeah! Murder! Yes! Execution! DIE! Woo-Hoo!
To be fair, anarchist Ron Paul said he doesn't think people
without insurance should be left to die and when asked about the crowd's
response, Rick Perry said he was taken aback and that that response didn't represent the Republican Party because the Republican Party is
the party of life (we can debate that last statement from the 'most executions
ever' Governor at a later date.).
Alan Grayson was right.
"Let's remember that we should care about people even
after they're born."
Hey, I just found this. It dovetails quite nicely with the
points I brought up...
Teabaggers are the dumbest fuckers on the planet.
Mark
Why do you hate America, Bill?
David
Yes Billy why?
I have very sarcastic friends. Wouldn’t want any other.
Bill Mancuso
I'm only following the words of Jesus, just like the
Teabaggers.
Brian
Ron Paul made me puke while I watched that debate. Rick Perry is an arrogant asshole. This bunch doesn't give Republicans
much hope for 2012. Mitt Romney would be a good nomination. Unfortunately I
think he is too meek to get the votes. I am sitting back and watching for the
time being to see who else the Republicans will throw in the ring later.
Richard
Bill, you obviously didn't watch the actual video. Wolf went
on about how a young healthy man who made good money, simply chose not to have
healthcare, because he didn't want it and didn't feel that he needed it.
And so when he does get sick, who should pay for it? Paul's
answer was essentially, "he is an adult, he chose no to have insurance,
now he has to accept responsibility for it"...
The tea party people applauded that, that people should make
their own decisions and live with them. I know that you Libs don't believe in
personal responsibility, and that passing the buck for your poor decisions to
someone else is every American's god given right, but a lot of America
disagrees.
Nobody applauded someone dying, they applauded the notion
that people need to take charge of their own lives.
Brian
I would love it if people were actually made to accept
responsibility for themselves, Richard.
Bill Mancuso
Yes, Richard. I did watch the whole debate.
No, Richard. The Teabaggers did not applaud people making
their own decisions and living with them. The question had moved on from there.
Wolf Blitzer asked, "Congressman, are you saying that society should just
let him die?" People screamed YEAH! and whistled and applauded.
They specifically applauded letting people die.
Even Ron Paul said he didn't think people without insurance
should be left to die. But I guess you didn't pay attention to that part.
You obviously only paid attention to the parts you wanted to
and ignored everything you didn't like or agree with.
The only thing Brian Williams was able to say to Gov. Perry was,
"Your state executed 234 death row inmates, more than any other governor
in modern times..." before hoots and whistles and cheers and applause
broke out. What's your excuse for them? They were applauding the execution of
criminals, I suppose. Well, you'd be wrong in that assumption, as well.
Even Rick Perry said he was taken aback by the audience's
response. But I guess you didn't pay attention to that, either.
No, Richard. Liberals do not believe in passing the buck and
not taking personal responsibility. That is a simple-minded, moronic,
right-wing straw man statement.
Yes, Richard. You're talking complete shit again.
Bill Mancuso
Brian, I agree with almost everything you said. I don't care
for Romney, though. I might be able to form an opinion about him if he didn't
keep changing what he says. I will admit that he and Jon Huntsman are the least
offensive and probably the smartest of the bunch. But that's not exactly that difficult of an accomplishment.
This next, seemingly unprovoked, attack was indeed
provoked. I’ll explain at the end.
Bill Mancuso
And another thing, Richard. One time, a year ago, I accused
you of getting your information from FOX "News" and you told me you
didn't watch FOX "News" so I never mentioned it again. But for months
afterward, you kept saying I was accusing you of getting your information from
FOX, even though I only said it the ONE time and NEVER again. It's like you
fixated on that one-time claim and never let go even though new information was
introduced into the equation.
I mention that only because I was wondering how many times I
have to explain to you that I'm not a Liberal before you'll accept this
information and stop calling me a Liberal? I realize you are only able to
understand the world in black and white, Republican and Democrat, conservative
and liberal terms, but the world is many shades of gray. So simply calling
everyone a Liberal or Democrat that doesn't agree with you may be convenient to
your bumper sticker mentality, but it would also be inaccurate. Unlike you, who
is mentally hampered by blind obedience to the Republican political agenda, I
follow no party, therefore I'm free to think for myself and make my own
decisions. So the next time you feel the urge to say, "Libs like you bla
bla bla," try saying instead, "Freethinkers like you bla bla
bla." I know it's a new concept to you, but try really hard. I know you
can do it.
And the only reason I thought you got your information from
FOX "News" was because everything you say (even now) is exactly the
same as what they say on FOX "News." But then, I don't listen to
Limbaugh, so they just might be using the same ignorant right-wing talking
points that you dutifully repeat.
Check out how the ninja master uses his skills to parry
that attack.
Richard
Bill, that is lie. Nobody applauded anyone dying. If you
believe that, you are blinded by your hatred and ideology. You are everything
that you claim the opposition to be.
They applauded Paul's response, which I agreed with. Go
watch the video again.
See that? Ignored like a fucking master.
Bill Mancuso
You're right. They did also applaud Paul's "freedom
means taking your own risk" comment.
Now, continue watching the video. Not just up to the part
where you think you've made your indisputable point. Which, I will grant you,
it is indisputable. It just has nothing to do with the topic I presented. You could also
pick out anything else from the video and say that they did or didn't applaud
it, but again, it wouldn't be the topic.
The applause dies down. Then Wolf Blitzer asked the new
question, "Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him
die?" To which people then began screaming YEAH! and whistled and
applauded.
They specifically
applauded letting people die. That is the topic.
After watching the WHOLE video, if it seems to you like I'm
lying, then the video has been altered. And the only way to prove the video was
altered is for Spock to play a game of tri-dimensional chess against the
computer to see if its programming has been altered. Then Dr. McCoy can isolate
all of our heartbeats and the only one left will be from your argument hiding
behind the bulkhead down in engineering, waiting to pounce on the truth and
kill it in revenge for being truthful.
That was fun. I like Star Trek.
Bill Mancuso
And you still didn't explain the cheers to Rick Perry's
death record.
Richard
Sorry Bill, I am on a race track and will have to go watch
the video again and comment later.
********************
Guess who’s apparently still at the track 6 days later as of
this posting?
You decide what the Teabaggers are applauding. Here are the
two video clips in question:
Now, as for my “unprovoked” attack: When things are posted
to my Facebook threads, I get an e-mail notification. I don’t read them, I just
go to Facebook. When I was going through and deleting them, I noticed there
were two notifications where Richard had only posted once. So that time, I read
them. The first time he posted, he originally ended at the ellipsis (…) after
the second paragraph. The second one contained his entire posted response
including the third and fourth paragraphs. Now, those last two paragraphs do not contain
any new information. But what they do contain, are snarky insults. Which means
after he made his point (or what he thought was a point), he felt the need to
go back and add an insult directed at me just for the fun of it. And some
right-wing talking point lies to boot. So, I suddenly felt the need to point
out his ignorance – which you may have noticed, I did not point out to him for
a year until I was provoked.
Was I being a dick? Maybe. But I didn’t start it.
I kind of live life by an abridged version of Dalton’s three
simple rules:
1. Never underestimate your opponent. Expect the unexpected.
2. Never start anything unless it’s absolutely necessary.
3. Be nice. Until it’s time to not be nice.
No comments:
Post a Comment